Energy & exchange
Where do you build momentum?
S.P.I.T.E. maps how you exchange energy, interpret information, make decisions, and structure work—while recognizing a meaningful middle on every axis.
About 5 minutes · No account required · Basic result included
Each score sits on a continuum. A result within the central 40–60 band is reported as a hybrid instead of forcing a preference the responses do not strongly support.
Where do you build momentum?
How do you make sense of information?
What leads when tradeoffs get difficult?
How do you move work toward completion?
S.P.I.T.E. is an evolving self-reflection framework—not a clinical diagnostic or a measure of ability. Question wording, scoring, reliability, and team guidance will continue to be tested.
Answer for how you usually operate—not who you think you should be at your best.
Every paid account includes compatibility comparisons across Core Cognition, Reasoning Style, and Action Archetype. The example below shows the kind of analysis included, highlighting likely ease and friction without ranking people or deciding whether a relationship will succeed.
AVTX-D Operator + ISFJ-R Observer
This example uses 60% core-axis average + 20% reasoning fit + 20% action fit. Matching core states score 100; a hybrid paired with an endpoint scores 88; opposite endpoints use axis-specific values based on the framework's communication and structure rules.
Three outcomes on each core axis, expanded to 1,215 profiles by Reasoning Style and Action Archetype.
Four binary preference pairs. Official guidance says there are no best relationship-type combinations.
Comparison based on the Myers & Briggs Foundation type overview and its relationship guidance.
S.P.I.T.E. is being designed to support clearer conversations about energy, information, decisions, and structure—never to rank people or decide who belongs in a role.
Ask about the team pilot